I’ve
never heard someone saying about Earthlings,
“The Greatest Film I’ve ever seen on Earth.” Most people who watched it got
shocked and lots of them say that they felt like vomiting for its brutality.
Actually, I did not feel sick while watching the film. Even though I had known
the contents and how it looks before I saw, I felt remorse for not feeling queasy;
I was like becoming a person who is shameless and cold-hearted. Yet, I was eager
to shut down my laptop throughout the whole video. At the moment I finished
about one-third of it, I didn’t want to look on it anymore. I don’t know
whether I was avoiding the reality or simply was unbearable to see such cruel
scenes. Tears came into my eyes. It is uncertain whether it was a tear of
self-blaming or just a tear of a pity. On just now, I don’t want to eat meat. However,
the reason why I cannot promise to be a vegetarian is that I don’t have the
courage to control my appetite in front of delicious looking steak. I am a ‘weak’
person.
Before
I watch the film, I had skeptical thoughts about it. I had a doubt that why the
author made it and persuade people to watch it though there would be no change
without an instant shock. Only a few people become vegetarians. Most people do
not stop eating meat even after knowing it is a cruel, shocking, and impersonal
behavior. The author might not want everyone to stop eating meat also. Indeed,
the most difficult thing for human beings is to restrain their instinct. The
instinct is the fundamental desire to eat, sleep, and be free. Is it wrong to
live depending on instinct? Is it wrong to hunt and eat animals for your
desire? Is it wrong to follow your desires?
Actually,
it is totally groundless if you say you’re going to be a vegetarian with a love
toward animals. At the moment you determine not to eat meat, how about eggs? Then
how about plants? It makes a conclusion that you shouldn’t eat anything that
has a life. What comes meaningful when you simply stop eating meat? It won’t
help to make a better world. Slaughterers would continually kill animals
brutally as before because that brings them money. The motive for slaughterer
is people’s consumption. Their goal is to make more consumption and more money.
Then, it comes different in purpose between the slaughterers and the normal
people. Attitudes toward animals are different. Meat is a way to earn money for
the slaughterers while it is a way to satisfy desires for the normal people.
I
had these kinds of thoughts before I watched the film. However, after I watched
it, it was unable for me to say those words again. It was a SHOCK in a real
sense of the word. I realized that there are serious ethical problems in the
process. Eating food which is processed through ethically wrong methods makes
person a puppet. People always want to regard themselves as moral men. They
behave hypocritically. Look at the people who volunteer or donate for others. Do
all of them do such things with sincere mind to help other people? What is
different between ‘to love people’ and ‘to love animals’? No matter how humans
are selfish, if someone wants to love and help other beings, knowing what
condition they have for the first is the right order. It is an irony to put a
chunk of meat into your mouth with an illusion that you are a moral person who
can think of other beings.
“Animals have same
desires as human do; food, shelter, companionship, freedom of behavior,
avoidance of pain.”
I
have two puppies in my house. When the first one was little, I raised him in
the cage for convenience. However, what really made me sorry was that he
scratched the cage and moved round and round to get out from it. Eventually, it
was to take him out. When I brought my second puppy, I didn’t even take out the
cage. But what happen to most animals right before slaughtered? They scratch
the cage and move round and round, as my puppy did, and they even suffer a
stroke with a desire to be free. And they slowly go to death. The slaughtered
animals are no different from my puppies. Yet, why is it unendurable for me to
watch my puppies suffering while it’s not toward animals that I take in.
Meanwhile,
there are some methods the author used to effectively send his messages. He
tried to convince people by adopting striking structure and background. If the
structure of the film was focused on showing the reason why we have no choice
but to eat meat, people would justify killing animals. If the background music
was jazz instead of ‘documentaric’ music, the film would not be a critical
documentary but a fun play instead.
Mr. Garrioch...I have no idea with those 3 pictures above... I put just one of them, but I think my blog is strange...
답글삭제Not a big deal but it does look strange. Try and figure out how to best use and implement multimedia. You have a copied and pasted link that looks a bit out of place, so you should try and embed them. I include a link on my blog prompt to help with that. Some links would help your "ethos" as well.
답글삭제Generally, nice post. The writing is the strongest aspect, as your opinion is engaging and clear and personal. But the post itself needs improvement in terms of pics, videos, links. Title is also a bit standard. All in all, good.